Why the hell does USA-Gymnastics have a boner for Nastia Liukin?

I am not in a good mood. Sounds like a great time to write a blog about Nastia Liukin. Haven’t done that in awhile.

I understand she is the last AA Champion from the Olympics but USA-Gymnastics current boner for this little bitch is starting to sound like her father paid them off. Many people already think this happened in China. The Russian way.

The annual competition for “level tens” was bad enough. Then we have her making decisions at meetings for USA-Gymnastics when she isn’t on their “board” Now we have Nastia being the creative decision maker on the 2012 Olympic tour?

instrumental in the creative direction of the performances, as well as serving as a cast member.

Does that mean we get more of this abomination?

If you want to call this creative by all means go ahead but you are seriously fried. She looks like she is trying to hump the beam. Not exactky something I want to see Jordyn Wieber doing next year.

USA-gymnastics has never made a gymnast the face of their organization and that is exactly what they are trying to do with Nastia. It just doesn’t make sense. There is nothing likable about her. She doesn’t come across as a nice person. She is as phony as a 2 dollar bill. So she won the sports biggest “prize” by default and bad judging and possibly daddies check book SO WHAT?

This just doesn’t makes sense. Why Nastia is the girl our gymnastics federation wants to make the face of their sport.

USA-Gymnastics likes people like Mary Lou Retton. Not like Nastia.

Please fill me in. I even want to hear from Nastia fans because I do not get the love.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

I didn’t go to the tour last time because the fluff they were selling would have made me throw up my cotton candy. I didn’t go in 04 either but I attended every tour from from 84-2000. (some of those weren’t by choice. I was dragged by my mother:)